Patent Claim Drafting – Use of “OR”

15_12_24_s&wIt is surprising to read a Federal Circuit case on patent claim construction, delving deeply into the difference between “and” and “or”, referencing Stunk & White — and incorrectly writing “of” when the court meant to use “or” in a quote from Struck & White!

The Federal Circuit wrote: “A common treatise on grammar teaches that ‘an article of a preposition applying to all the members of the series must either be used only before the first term or else be repeated before each term.’ William Strunk, Jr. & E.B. White, The Elements of Style, 27 (4th ed. 2000).” SuperGuide Corp. v. DirecTV Enterprises, Inc., 358 F.3d 870, ¶ 68 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

An article of a preposition” — upon reading this I wondered: is this some rule of grammar that I never learned? A preposition states the relationship between objects, and does not require an article. So, I went to the source — Strunk & White. And here is what it actually says: “[a]n article or a preposition applying to all the members of a series must either be used only before the first term or else be repeated before each of them.” Strunk & White, The Elements of Style, page 27, emphasis added.

15_12_22_S&W

 

Of course, it’s a typo in the Federal Circuit case.  BUT, this misquote of Strunk & White has been repeated in scholarly articles analyzing the use of “or” in patent claim construction.  I’m not sure how “or” what these authors were thinking when they read about an “article of a preposition” but they certainly weren’t thinking about grammar!

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

Now that this confusion had been cleared up, here is a brief summary on the Federal  Circuit’s interpretation of “OR” in patent claim drafting:

– OR – INTERPRETATION #1 –

“Or” may mean: A or B, but not A and B.

If a claim uses “or” it may be interpreted to mean a choice between two items, but not both. Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, 264 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2001). The Kustom Signals court stated: “The district court construed the term ‘or’ … to mean ‘a choice between either one of two alternatives, but not both.’” Kustom Signals, 264 F.3d at 1330. The court held that “The prosecution history requires that ‘or’ means the operator’s choice between search for the strongest or fastest target speed, but not both. The district court’s claim construction is affirmed.” Kustom Signals, 264 F.3d at 1331-1332.

– OR – INTERPRETATION #2 –

Or (pun intended) “or” may mean: A, or B, or A and B. See, Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2001). In Brown, the court held that “or” meant A, or B, or C, or any combination of A, B and C.

Lesson learned: be clear in claim drafting, and be careful when using the word “or”.

 

Advertisements

One thought on “Patent Claim Drafting – Use of “OR”

  1. IN CRIMINAL COURT “AND” MEANS “OR”.  Daniel M. Mayfield Attorney At Law Carpenter and Mayfield 730 N. First Street San Jose, CA  95112 PH: (408) 287-1916 FX: (408) 287-9857

    This message is for the intended recipient only.  It is from the law offices of CARPENTER AND MAYFIELD.  Any interception, detection, infection, inspection, hoodoo, voodoo, sneak and peak, or any other unethical or unconstitutional spying on the part of the U.S. Department of Justice, Homeland Security, FBI, CIA, NSA, or any other alphabet agency is strictly prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted, punished, and publicized.  Thank you for your cooperation.

    From: Adams Law Blogsite To: daniel_mayfield@att.net Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 1:31 PM Subject: [New post] Patent Claim Drafting – Use of “OR” #yiv7407045032 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv7407045032 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv7407045032 a.yiv7407045032primaryactionlink:link, #yiv7407045032 a.yiv7407045032primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv7407045032 a.yiv7407045032primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv7407045032 a.yiv7407045032primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv7407045032 WordPress.com | webworker11 posted: “It is surprising to read a Federal Circuit case on patent claim construction, delving deeply into the difference between “and” and “or”, referencing Stunk & White — and incorrectly using “or” in a quote from Struck & White!Yes, the Federal Ci” | | Respond to this post by replying above this line |

    | | |

    | New post on Adams Law Blogsite | |

    | | | | Patent Claim Drafting – Use of “OR” by webworker11 |

    It is surprising to read a Federal Circuit case

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s